tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20132666.post4667594794936090686..comments2023-12-31T10:08:03.121-05:00Comments on Politics and Pigskins: The Importance of Clinton's LesbianismEdMcGonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05892046331126818396noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20132666.post-66471833028239462262007-11-27T13:32:00.000-05:002007-11-27T13:32:00.000-05:00"Rodak, Your point?"This COMEDIC GENIUS!!"Rodak, <BR/>Your point?"<BR/><BR/>This COMEDIC GENIUS!!Rodakhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00077919085157653816noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20132666.post-9687686379381832112007-11-27T10:43:00.000-05:002007-11-27T10:43:00.000-05:00Ed my friend... (*GRIN*)I did read your post - you...Ed my friend... (*GRIN*)<BR/><BR/>I did read your post - your entire post. Not quite sure why you assume I didn't.<BR/><BR/>Basically, you make your case on "maybes" and "ifs." Nothing wrong with that. (*SHRUG*) My post simply gave my view - it didn't attack yours.<BR/><BR/>You claim Hillary's personal life was never important to her based on...<BR/><BR/>(See the problem, Ed???)<BR/><BR/>Anyway... perhaps HRC or Bill (or Chelsea!) will stumble across your blog, read your post, read my reply...<BR/><BR/>(*HUGE FRIGG'N EYE ROLLING GRIN*)<BR/><BR/>...and give us the straight skinny.<BR/><BR/>Till then...<BR/><BR/>BILLAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20132666.post-5821316405939446752007-11-26T23:03:00.000-05:002007-11-26T23:03:00.000-05:00Rodak, Your point?Bill,Finish reading the post bef...Rodak, <BR/>Your point?<BR/><BR/>Bill,<BR/>Finish reading the post before you start commenting. ;)EdMcGonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05892046331126818396noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20132666.post-44304985538905535052007-11-26T14:15:00.000-05:002007-11-26T14:15:00.000-05:00"While there have been loveless marriages in polit..."While there have been loveless marriages in politics, has there ever been a marriage that was politically choreographed from the start, between an oversexed heterosexual man and a lesbian?"<BR/><BR/>Actually, Ed... throughout most of history marriages were arranged - especially "noble" and "royal" marriages. Also "economic" unions between "commercial" families.<BR/><BR/>Lesbian... bisexual... straight... bottom line Bill and Hillary had Chelsea together - the dynasty marches on.<BR/><BR/>Now I'm pretty anti-Clinton, but I doubt that Bill and Hillary's marriage is a "shame" in the sense that they don't love each other and never did. I reject that. Yes... there marriage was ALSO a "businesss" arrangement, a political partnership with a specific course set all along. I don't doubt that for a minute. But no... I don't believe Bill was Hillary's "beard," whether her primary sexual attraction is to women or not.<BR/><BR/>Professional collaberation yes. Charade no. That's how I see it - best guess. "Loveless" marriage? I highly doubt it.<BR/><BR/>BILLAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20132666.post-84331427610905733632007-11-26T13:46:00.000-05:002007-11-26T13:46:00.000-05:00Ed--Since there's a writers' strike on, I really t...Ed--<BR/>Since there's a writers' strike on, I really think that you should be offering this stuff to Jay Leno. This could be your big break!Rodakhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00077919085157653816noreply@blogger.com